Bug 2011688 - [RFE] Create a preflight validation ensuring we expose default networks with the default names
Summary: [RFE] Create a preflight validation ensuring we expose default networks with ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-tripleo-validations
Version: 17.1 (Wallaby)
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: zstream
: ---
Assignee: mathieu bultel
QA Contact: nlevinki
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-10-07 05:56 UTC by Cédric Jeanneret
Modified: 2023-12-02 04:25 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-04-14 12:28:42 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker OSP-10245 0 None None None 2021-11-18 15:00:17 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker VALFRWK-674 0 None None None 2021-10-07 05:56:33 UTC

Description Cédric Jeanneret 2021-10-07 05:56:16 UTC
An Operator might create their own network-data in order to provide some custom information.

While this is fully supported, it may happen the actual "name" value is changed (typo, or will to change it). This will then create unexpected issues due to the amount of checks done against the "network.name" within tripleo-heat-templates and related tools.

The goal here is to raise two kind of things, depending on what is found in the network-data:

- a simple warning if the only missing networks are InternalApi or Storage (in such case, the ctlplane is used)
- a hard stop if any of the other default networks (StorageMgmt, Tenant, External) is missing

That should prevent some headaches and support cases, while adding some more confidence when we go down the "custom network" path.

This can be a proper validation provided by tripleo-validations, and called as an OC deploy preflight check.

Comment 1 pweeks 2022-01-19 21:46:48 UTC
Moving to networking for prioritization.
Dev whiteboard the DFG:UV for good measure.

Comment 2 mathieu bultel 2023-04-14 12:28:42 UTC
I'm moving this to "won't fix", if someone wants to revived this RFE and put effort, we can re-open it and assigned ressources.

Comment 4 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-12-02 04:25:21 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.