Term Bare-metal for installation using rpm is misleading The term "bare-metal" is misleading for a rpm based installation, in contrast to containerized: bare-metal is usually meaning a non-virtualized environment. When bare-metal is used, the assumption may be to have either no need for an OS or it may run in VMs also whereas containerized requires an OS with containers enabled and may be running either on bare-metal nodes or in VMs. Please correct wording because it may cause confusion based on another meaning of "bare-metal". Reported by: matthiasmuench https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_ceph_storage/4/html/installation_guide/red-hat-ceph-storage-considerations-and-recommendations#annotations:08660b79-069d-4e53-8e43-2a7a5abf3dfd
Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.
Re-reading the paragraph, I guess the intention was to briefly explain that we can run on bare metal nodes using rpms and also in containers. Both methods, however are supported for bare metal and when using VMs. We might use: "Ceph OSDs can run on bare-metal servers or VMs within the storage cluster, using containers or rpm based deployments."