Description of problem: Performance degradation in sequential IO for borh RBD and CephFS ( also in Random - described in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2015520 ) is observed with 4.9 ( OCP 4.9 and OCS 4.9) as compared to 4.8 and OCS 4.7 with 4Kib, 16Kib and 64Kib block size. Please note that those results are consistent - similar results were received by running the FIO benchmark test twice. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): OCS versions ============== NAME DISPLAY VERSION REPLACES PHASE noobaa-operator.v4.9.0 NooBaa Operator 4.9.0 Succeeded ocs-operator.v4.9.0 OpenShift Container Storage 4.9.0 Succeeded odf-operator.v4.9.0 OpenShift Data Foundation 4.9.0 Succeeded ODF (OCS) build : full_version: 4.9.0-210.ci Rook versions =============== 2021-11-04 09:27:36.633082 I | op-flags: failed to set flag "logtostderr". no such flag -logtostderr rook: 4.9-210.f6e2005.release_4.9 go: go1.16.6 Ceph versions =============== ceph version 16.2.0-143.el8cp (0e2c6f9639c37a03e55885fb922dc0cb1b5173cb) pacific (stable) Full Version list is available here : http://ocsperf.ceph.redhat.com/logs/Performance_tests/4.9/RC0/Vmware-LSO/versions.txt How reproducible: Run test_fio_benchmark test Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run test_fio_benchark test ( sequential RBD and sequential CephFS) 2. Compare the results to OCS 4.8 and OCS 4.7 Actual results: The performance is worse than in 4.8 and also worse than in 4.7 Expected results: Performance should be at least similar to 4.8. Additional info: Comparison results between OCS 4.7, OCS 4.8 and OCS 4.9 are available here: http://ocsperf.ceph.redhat.com:8080/index.php?version1=2&build1=6&platform1=2&az_topology1=1&test_name%5B%5D=1&version2=5&build2=11&platform2=2&az_topology2=1&version3=6&build3=18&platform3=2&az_topology3=1&version4=&build4=&platform4=2&az_topology4=1&submit=Choose+options Comparison PErformance report for VMware LSO ( 4.9 vs 4.8) is available here : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ft7gzWCcID2RTXILW3GrN8a6O5v5VidDICuG_tX__v8/edit#
Ben, Please close this as a dup, or re-assign it to Greg Farnum if it is not.
Not a 4.10 blocker
This BZ is being moved between releases without any analysis, looks like we need a new occurrence on the latest release. Closing it for now.