Bug 2023334 - [cephadm]5.0 - Ceph orch ls status for ports is seen with ?:port number instead of *:port number after upgrading from 5.0 to 5.1
Summary: [cephadm]5.0 - Ceph orch ls status for ports is seen with ?:port number inste...
Keywords:
Status: POST
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: Cephadm
Version: 5.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 7.0
Assignee: Adam King
QA Contact: Sunil Kumar Nagaraju
Karen Norteman
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-11-15 12:37 UTC by Preethi
Modified: 2023-08-15 13:51 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-2300 0 None None None 2021-11-15 12:40:05 UTC

Description Preethi 2021-11-15 12:37:32 UTC
Description of problem:[cephadm]5.0 - Ceph orch ls status for ports is seen with ?:port number instead of *:port number after upgrading from 5.0 to 5.1


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

ceph version 16.2.6-20.el8cp (d8f09f665f2f4f981086ef006832a9251eb28322) pacific (stable)
[ceph: root@magna031 /]# 

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Perform upgrade from 5.0 to 5.1 having mon,mgr,osd,rbd-mirron,iscsirgw services
2. observe ceph orch ls status once upgrade is successful

Actual results: We saw MON and MGR crash after upgrade was successful and we are tracking the issues in the BZ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984881

post upgrade was done, we see status as below under PORT status as ? instead of *. Before upgrade we see the status as *:portnumber. Ceph orch ps reports as *:portnumber for each services.

[ceph: root@magna031 /]# ceph orch ls
NAME               PORTS        RUNNING  REFRESHED  AGE  PLACEMENT                                     
alertmanager       ?:9093,9094      1/1  88s ago    9w   count:1                                       
crash                               9/9  2m ago     9w   *                                             
grafana            ?:3000           1/1  88s ago    9w   count:1                                       
iscsi.iscsi                         4/4  2m ago     5w   depressa001;depressa002;depressa003;magna006  
mds.backup                          2/2  90s ago    5w   magna031;magna032;count:2                     
mgr                                 3/3  2m ago     9w   magna031;magna032;magna006;count:3            
mon                                 3/3  2m ago     9w   magna031;magna032;magna006;count:3            
node-exporter      ?:9100           9/9  2m ago     9w   *                                             
osd                               15/15  2m ago     -    <unmanaged>                                   
osd.osd_with_nvme                 12/15  2m ago     4w   depressa00[4-6].ceph.redhat.com               
prometheus         ?:9095           1/1  88s ago    9w   count:1                                       
rbd-mirror                          1/1  88s ago    8w   magna031                                      
rgw.foo            ?:80             2/2  2m ago     4w   count:2                                       
[ceph: root@magna031 /]# 





Expected results: We should see * instead of ? in port status for placeholder.


Additional info: magna031


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.