Bug 2032515 - Could not deploy OCS 4.8 [NEEDINFO]
Summary: Could not deploy OCS 4.8
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: ocs-operator
Version: 4.8
Hardware: ppc64le
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Jose A. Rivera
QA Contact: Elad
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-12-14 15:43 UTC by Sridhar Venkat (IBM)
Modified: 2023-08-09 17:00 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-05-30 10:55:50 UTC
Embargoed:
muagarwa: needinfo? (svenkat)


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Sridhar Venkat (IBM) 2021-12-14 15:43:16 UTC
Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log
snippets): Could not deploy OCS 4.8. Two of the three osd pods are in init state. One of the osd pod is ok.


Version of all relevant components (if applicable): 4.8


Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product
(please explain in detail what is the user impact)? Yes


Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge? No


Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this
bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)? 1


Can this issue reproducible? Yes


Can this issue reproduce from the UI?


If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.


Actual results: OCS cluster is not up.


Expected results: OCS cluster to be up and running.


Additional info:

Comment 2 Sridhar Venkat (IBM) 2021-12-14 15:47:22 UTC
Mustgather logs are in https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YWfSlN9MIa8m9oJZP6YtRYTCGbQBl7Qs/view?usp=sharing

Executed the following to collect the logs: oc adm must-gather --image=registry.redhat.io/ocs4/ocs-must-gather-rhel8:v4.8 --dest-dir=/root/logs

Comment 3 Sridhar Venkat (IBM) 2021-12-14 16:20:11 UTC
OCS was deployed using UI.

Comment 4 Mudit Agarwal 2022-01-31 17:50:53 UTC
What is the current status on this? Is it reproducible?

Comment 5 Jose A. Rivera 2022-02-07 16:48:00 UTC
No one has looked at this yet, but we also haven't heard from IBM about this yet. At present I'll just move this out to ODF 4.11.

Comment 6 Mudit Agarwal 2022-05-30 10:55:50 UTC
Please reopen if this is still an issue.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.