Bug 205050 - Spec file alterations
Summary: Spec file alterations
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: f-spot
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Christopher Aillon
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-09-02 23:48 UTC by Paul F. Johnson
Modified: 2007-12-26 14:03 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-12-26 14:03:12 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
f-spot spec file patch (307 bytes, patch)
2006-09-02 23:48 UTC, Paul F. Johnson
no flags Details | Diff

Description Paul F. Johnson 2006-09-02 23:48:35 UTC
Description of problem:
Attached patch file patches the spec file to bring it into line with the
packaging guidelines

It just adds the %{?dist} onto the release tag

Comment 1 Paul F. Johnson 2006-09-02 23:48:35 UTC
Created attachment 135440 [details]
f-spot spec file patch

Comment 2 Toshio Kuratomi 2006-09-03 05:01:45 UTC
The dist tag is not a mandatory requirement.

It is recommended as the easiest way to make sure that a package on a newer
release of Fedora Core will upgrade an older release but it is up to the
maintainer to decide if they want to make use of the tag to help them do this or
if they are going to manually make sure that an update release for an older FC
does not break the upgrade path to newer releases' packages.

http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag

Comment 3 Paul F. Johnson 2006-09-03 08:48:55 UTC
Given it's a mono package and therefore only going to hit FC5 and above (unless
mono is back ported that is), surely the dist tag should be used.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.