Bug 205464 - procmail is unable to write to files >2GB
Summary: procmail is unable to write to files >2GB
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3
Classification: Red Hat
Component: procmail
Version: 3.8
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Miroslav Lichvar
QA Contact: Brock Organ
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 228487
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-09-06 15:36 UTC by Milan Kerslager
Modified: 2007-11-17 01:14 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: RHBA-2007-0420
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-06-11 18:37:59 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
strace of refused mail delivery to the 2GB mailbox (3.14 KB, text/plain)
2006-09-06 15:36 UTC, Milan Kerslager 		no flags Details
Large file support. (9.76 KB, patch)
2006-10-20 12:50 UTC, Miroslav Lichvar 		no flags Details | Diff
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2007:0420 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE procmail bug fix update 2007-06-07 20:23:23 UTC

Description Milan Kerslager 2006-09-06 15:36:44 UTC 
Procmail refuses to deliver mails when the mailbox (inbox) is greater than 2GB.
I'm using sendmail so there is no problem with postfix limits.
Comment 1 Milan Kerslager 2006-09-06 15:36:44 UTC 
Created attachment 135660 [details]
strace of refused mail delivery to the 2GB mailbox
Comment 2 Miroslav Lichvar 2006-10-20 12:50:18 UTC 
Created attachment 138967 [details]
Large file support.

Attaching patch backported from the devel package. Also -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE in CFLAGS is required.
Comment 8 Red Hat Bugzilla 2007-06-11 18:37:59 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0420.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.