Bug 2073024 - Please branch and build qt6ct in epel9
Summary: Please branch and build qt6ct in epel9
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: qt6ct
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: MartinKG
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-04-07 13:30 UTC by Troy Dawson
Modified: 2022-04-17 23:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: qt6ct-0.5-1.el9
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-04-17 23:11:06 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Troy Dawson 2022-04-07 13:30:08 UTC
Please branch and build qt6ct in epel9.

Please also add the kde-sig as a co-maintainer (FES: kde-sig)
I wouldn't mind being a co-maintainer as well, but since I am part of the kde-sig that is optional  (FES: tdawson)
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qt6ct/adduser

If you do not wish to maintain qt6ct in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, please let me know and I'll take care of it.

I have tested and the rawhide package builds in EPEL9 without any changes.

Comment 1 MartinKG 2022-04-08 06:39:53 UTC
epel9 branch request done
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43561

add you as co maintainer
build package not done

Comment 2 Troy Dawson 2022-04-08 16:29:24 UTC
(In reply to MartinKG from comment #1)
> epel9 branch request done
> https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43561
> 

That was for qpwgraph
Here is a branch request for qt6ct
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43564

> add you as co maintainer
> build package not done

Thank You
I'll go ahead and build it on epel9 unless you really want to.

Comment 3 Troy Dawson 2022-04-08 16:37:41 UTC
(In reply to Troy Dawson from comment #2)
> (In reply to MartinKG from comment #1)
> > epel9 branch request done
> > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43561
> > 
> 
> That was for qpwgraph

By the way, qpwgraph does build on epel9 now that I've gotten qt6 in epel9.
Now that it's branched, would you mind building it on epel9?
Or if you want, add me as a co-maintainer and I can build it on epel9?

That looks like something epel9 users would want.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2022-04-08 18:24:38 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e42301399a has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e42301399a

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2022-04-08 21:13:29 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e42301399a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e42301399a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 6 MartinKG 2022-04-09 10:22:40 UTC
(In reply to Troy Dawson from comment #3)
> (In reply to Troy Dawson from comment #2)
> > (In reply to MartinKG from comment #1)
> > > epel9 branch request done
> > > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43561
> > > 
> > 
> > That was for qpwgraph
> 
> By the way, qpwgraph does build on epel9 now that I've gotten qt6 in epel9.
> Now that it's branched, would you mind building it on epel9?
> Or if you want, add me as a co-maintainer and I can build it on epel9?
> 
> That looks like something epel9 users would want.

i have added you as co-maintainer to qpwgraph as well, please build the package for EPEL9 as well.
Many thanks.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-04-17 23:11:06 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e42301399a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.