Bug 2086449 - [DDF] How about .rgw.buckets.index and .rgw.buckets.non-ec? Can I configure they are erasure-coded pool?
Summary: [DDF] How about .rgw.buckets.index and .rgw.buckets.non-ec? Can I configure t...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: Documentation
Version: 4.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.3z2
Assignee: Anjana Suparna Sriram
QA Contact: Madhavi Kasturi
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-05-16 07:35 UTC by Direct Docs Feedback
Modified: 2023-07-25 18:12 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-4315 0 None None None 2022-05-16 07:45:58 UTC

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2022-05-16 07:35:34 UTC 
How about .rgw.buckets.index and .rgw.buckets.non-ec? Can I configure they are erasure-coded pool?

Reported by: moly7x

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_ceph_storage/4/html/storage_strategies_guide/erasure_code_pools#annotations:b3cc988f-5a80-422b-864e-2689704b1310
Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2022-05-16 07:35:40 UTC 
Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.