Bug 2095132 - Package request for EPE9 - gnome-calendar
Summary: Package request for EPE9 - gnome-calendar
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: gnome-calendar
Version: epel9
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Igor Raits
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: cinnamon-epel9
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-06-09 06:02 UTC by Panos Asproulis
Modified: 2022-12-18 00:43 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: gnome-calendar-40.2-1.el9
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-12-18 00:43:14 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Panos Asproulis 2022-06-09 06:02:39 UTC
Please, branch and build package gnome-calendar for EPEL9.

Comment 1 Yaakov Selkowitz 2022-12-06 03:12:11 UTC
Since F36 (GNOME 42) gnome-calendar requires gtk4 4.6 but RHEL9 has only 4.4, so at most this would have to be from F35 (GNOME 41), or from F34 (GNOME 40) to match the rest of RHEL9.  Either way, two dependencies -- libdazzle-devel and libhandy-devel -- are missing from RHEL.  These can be substituted with EPEL-only packages as outlined in https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-missing-sub-packages/

I am also interested in gnome-calendar for EPEL9 as a dependency of other packages.  If you are willing to maintain this in EPEL, then I can help with the EPEL-only packages if you need.  If you are not interested, then I am willing to do so for EPEL.

Comment 2 Kalev Lember 2022-12-07 17:07:29 UTC
It would be awesome if you could help, Yaakov. Thanks! Are you part of epel-packagers-sig?

Comment 3 Yaakov Selkowitz 2022-12-07 17:13:34 UTC
Yes, I am.  I filed the following to create the EPEL-only packages for the missing dependencies:

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/49728
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/49729

Comment 4 Kalev Lember 2022-12-07 17:50:58 UTC
OK, I added @epel-packagers-sig to the package. Thanks for the help with this!

Comment 5 Yaakov Selkowitz 2022-12-09 06:30:15 UTC
Dependencies are built, requested branch: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/49778

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-12-09 18:07:15 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-27b3e35cfd has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-27b3e35cfd

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-12-10 02:32:08 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-27b3e35cfd has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-27b3e35cfd

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-12-18 00:43:14 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-27b3e35cfd has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.