Bug 209598 - Missing build of tremulous-data
Missing build of tremulous-data
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: tremulous-data (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Hans de Goede
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2006-10-06 06:52 EDT by Michael Schwendt
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-10-06 08:22:55 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Michael Schwendt 2006-10-06 06:52:08 EDT
j.w.r.degoede AT hhs.nl
        tremulous - 1.1.0-2.fc5.i386    (23 days)
        tremulous - 1.1.0-2.fc5.ppc    (23 days)
        tremulous - 1.1.0-2.fc5.x86_64    (23 days)
    Broken packages in fedora-extras-5-ppc:
    tremulous-1.1.0-2.fc5.ppc  requires  tremulous-data = 0:1.1.0

Broken packages in fedora-extras-5-x86_64:
    tremulous-1.1.0-2.fc5.x86_64  requires  tremulous-data = 0:1.1.0

Broken packages in fedora-extras-5-i386:
    tremulous-1.1.0-2.fc5.i386  requires  tremulous-data = 0:1.1.0
Comment 1 Hans de Goede 2006-10-06 07:10:23 EDT
I know, I've send this mail to Warren about this twice:

<second try>

As discussed quite some time ago for another package I've just recently
build a new huge (100MB) noarch data/contents only package, its not been given a
disttag so that the resulting noarch.rpm can be copied over to other branches
(hardlinked) to save diskspace and mirror bandwidth.

The package involved is tremulous-data and the full package name is:

Can you please copy this over to the FE-5 repo, thanks!

Thanks & Regards,



If you've changed your mind about doing things this way for huge noarch packages
please let me know then I'll request a branch and build this for FE-5

I've put Warren in the CC of this bug.
Comment 2 Michael Schwendt 2006-10-06 08:22:55 EDT
We've never done it in private mail, but via the Wiki:


Anyway, fixed. Packages will appear with next push.
Comment 3 Hans de Goede 2006-10-06 08:40:10 EDT
Ah, I didn't know that, thanks.


We did do it by private mail another package of mine was the start of this
mechanism and back then when asking for procedures around this Warren said just
mail me for now. I guess I never caught up when a procedure was created.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.