Description of problem: glibc-gconv-extra is outdated on ubi8. It appears glibc got upgraded and glibc-gconv-extra did not. This is breaking our CI pipelines. $ podman run -it --rm ubi/ubi8:latest << EOF > dnf list glibc* > dnf install rpm-build -y > EOF WARN[0000] The input device is not a TTY. The --tty and --interactive flags might not work properly dnf list glibc* dnf install rpm-build -y [root@40b82d57d449 /]# dnf list glibc* Red Hat Universal Base Image 8 (RPMs) - BaseOS 1.0 MB/s | 783 kB 00:00 Red Hat Universal Base Image 8 (RPMs) - AppStre 4.2 MB/s | 3.0 MB 00:00 Red Hat Universal Base Image 8 (RPMs) - CodeRea 43 kB/s | 18 kB 00:00 Installed Packages glibc.x86_64 2.28-189.5.el8_6 @ubi glibc-common.x86_64 2.28-189.5.el8_6 @ubi glibc-langpack-en.x86_64 2.28-189.5.el8_6 @ubi glibc-minimal-langpack.x86_64 2.28-189.5.el8_6 @ubi Available Packages glibc.i686 2.28-189.5.el8_6 ubi-8-baseos glibc-all-langpacks.x86_64 2.28-189.5.el8_6 ubi-8-baseos glibc-devel.i686 2.28-189.5.el8_6 ubi-8-baseos glibc-devel.x86_64 2.28-189.5.el8_6 ubi-8-baseos glibc-gconv-extra.x86_64 2.28-189.1.el8 ubi-8-appstream glibc-headers.i686 2.28-189.5.el8_6 ubi-8-baseos glibc-headers.x86_64 2.28-189.5.el8_6 ubi-8-baseos glibc-locale-source.x86_64 2.28-189.5.el8_6 ubi-8-baseos glibc-static.i686 2.28-189.5.el8_6 ubi-8-codeready-builder glibc-static.x86_64 2.28-189.5.el8_6 ubi-8-codeready-builder [root@40b82d57d449 /]# dnf install rpm-build -y Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:01 ago on Fri Jun 17 13:01:21 2022. Error: Problem: package rpm-build-4.14.3-23.el8.x86_64 requires system-rpm-config, but none of the providers can be installed - package redhat-rpm-config-129-1.el8.noarch requires glibc-gconv-extra, but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - nothing provides glibc(x86-64) = 2.28-189.1.el8 needed by glibc-gconv-extra-2.28-189.1.el8.x86_64 - nothing provides glibc-common = 2.28-189.1.el8 needed by glibc-gconv-extra-2.28-189.1.el8.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)
This has already been reported as bug 2098093, and we will track the fix there. I'm sorry for the inconvenience. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2098093 ***