Track the addition of "sssd-client" to the RHCS 5.3 image. We need this for supporting NFS user id managment in ODF 4.12 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2116521 +++ Description of problem: In ODF, we are working to support user ID management for NFS-Ganesha. We want to use SSSD for that since it supports several ID management services. To do so, we need to add the "sssd-client" package to the ceph/ceph image. It should be less than 500kB. I don't believe there are any binaries added as part of the "sssd-client" package; only shared libs. Of note, we should **not** add the "sssd" package, as that will add more than 100MB to the image. Only "sssd-client" is needed. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): We would like this for ODF 4.12, which uses RHCS 5.3. (I did not see that option available in the "Version" field above). Additional info: Because there is no binary installed by "sssd-client", in order to verify the SSSD client has been added to the Ceph image, I might suggest `rpm -q sssd-client`. We can also ensure the "sssd" package has not been added by ensuring `which sssd` returns failure. --- Additional comment from RHEL Program Management on 2022-08-08 17:36:00 UTC --- Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.
(In reply to Blaine Gardner from comment #0) > Track the addition of "sssd-client" to the RHCS 5.3 image. We need this for > supporting NFS user id managment in ODF 4.12 > > > > +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2116521 +++ > > Description of problem: > > In ODF, we are working to support user ID management for NFS-Ganesha. We > want to use SSSD for that since it supports several ID management services. > To do so, we need to add the "sssd-client" package to the ceph/ceph image. > It should be less than 500kB. I don't believe there are any binaries added > as part of the "sssd-client" package; only shared libs. > > Of note, we should **not** add the "sssd" package, as that will add more > than 100MB to the image. Only "sssd-client" is needed. > > > Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): > > We would like this for ODF 4.12, which uses RHCS 5.3. (I did not see that > option available in the "Version" field above). > > > Additional info: > > Because there is no binary installed by "sssd-client", in order to verify > the SSSD client has been added to the Ceph image, I might suggest `rpm -q > sssd-client`. We can also ensure the "sssd" package has not been added by > ensuring `which sssd` returns failure. > > --- Additional comment from RHEL Program Management on 2022-08-08 17:36:00 > UTC --- > > Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity. Blaine - the selected component here is RADOS. Is the change coming in the core part of Ceph or rook?
It's a package that needs added to the Ceph image, but none of the components seem to fit, so I picked RADOS. BZ didn't allow me to leave the component empty.
(In reply to Blaine Gardner from comment #4) > It's a package that needs added to the Ceph image, but none of the > components seem to fit, so I picked RADOS. BZ didn't allow me to leave the > component empty. Thanks, Blaine for confirming. I already see we have an RHCS bug - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116521 for tracking it. This mainly comes to general ODF distribution so I am changing to distribution.
The bug we were waiting on for this to be complete is now verfied: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116521 I am moving this to MODIFIED. Should we move to ON_QA, or go straight to VERIFIED? @muagarwa
Can be moved to ON_QA now as we are consuming 5.3 For QE: please test with the latest 4.12 build.