Bug 211837 - shadowman logos are outdated
Summary: shadowman logos are outdated
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: redhat-logos
Version: 5.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: David Zeuthen
QA Contact: Brock Organ
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 212015
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-10-23 14:15 UTC by Matthias Clasen
Modified: 2013-03-06 03:47 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: beta2
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-12-23 01:35:24 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Shadowman Start icons for RHEL...sizes include 16, 24, 32, 48, 96. (7.70 KB, application/zip)
2006-10-23 14:48 UTC, diana fong
no flags Details
shadowman icons that needs update (101.24 KB, application/octet-stream)
2006-10-24 17:10 UTC, David Zeuthen
no flags Details
Modified shadowmans from Comment 9's attachment (47.46 KB, application/zip)
2006-10-25 16:22 UTC, diana fong
no flags Details
Transparent Shadowmans in 16, 20, 22, 24, 32, 36, 48, 64, 96 (14.90 KB, application/zip)
2006-10-25 16:25 UTC, diana fong
no flags Details

Description Matthias Clasen 2006-10-23 14:15:55 UTC
it uses the old start-here icon, rather than a shadowman.

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2006-10-23 14:25:33 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux release.  Product Management has requested further review
of this request by Red Hat Engineering.  This request is not yet committed for
inclusion in release.

Comment 2 diana fong 2006-10-23 14:48:37 UTC
Created attachment 139135 [details]
Shadowman Start icons for RHEL...sizes include 16, 24, 32, 48, 96.

Comment 3 David Zeuthen 2006-10-23 14:53:37 UTC
dfong/mclasen: I believe older releases, e.g. RHEL4, uses a more cartoony hat as
shown here (picture randomly found on the Internet but ya'll probably remember)

 http://www.atmarkit.co.jp/flinux/prodreview/rhel4/g03.jpg

Are you sure we want to use the more flat Shadowman icon for RHEL5?


Comment 4 Matthias Clasen 2006-10-23 15:06:20 UTC
david, fyi: the panel is using the icon named "start-here" for the menu now
(which is why the old icon resurfaced)

Comment 5 David Zeuthen 2006-10-24 16:42:23 UTC
mclasen: so, why not simply fix the panel to use the an icon from redhat-logos
instead of, uhm, replacing the start-here icon with a Shadowman? Cuz, really,
I'm not how much sense it makes to make the icon named "start-here" a Shadowman,
in a way you're breaking at least some sort of ABI etc. etc.

FYI redhat-logos contains

 /usr/share/firstboot/pixmaps/shadowman-round-48.png
 /usr/share/pixmaps/redhat/shadowman-200.png
 /usr/share/pixmaps/redhat/shadowman-32.png
 /usr/share/pixmaps/redhat/shadowman-48.png
 /usr/share/pixmaps/redhat/shadowman-64.png
 /usr/share/pixmaps/redhat/shadowman-mini.png
 /usr/share/pixmaps/redhat/shadowman-round-48.png
 /usr/share/pixmaps/redhat/shadowman-transparent.png

which looks similar to the icons that Diana did though the red is somewhat more
vivid in her icons.


Comment 6 Matthias Clasen 2006-10-24 16:55:09 UTC
I'm fine with fixing this in the panel. The new icons are uptodate wrt to the
brand guidelines. Please replace the outdated existing ones.

Comment 7 David Zeuthen 2006-10-24 16:59:44 UTC
OK, reassigning this to redhat-logos and fixing up Summary to reflect that
shadowman icons in redhat-logos needs an update. New shadowman icons are
available in comment 2.

mclasen: Please open a new bug for the panel fix.


Comment 8 David Zeuthen 2006-10-24 17:00:41 UTC
Taking ownership of this bug (since johnp is no longer with us).

Comment 9 David Zeuthen 2006-10-24 17:10:30 UTC
Created attachment 139244 [details]
shadowman icons that needs update

dfong: We need updated icons for the ones in the attached archive file

These are

shadowman-200.png  shadowman-64.png	   shadowman-round-48.png
shadowman-32.png   shadowman-64.xpm	   shadowman-round-48.xpm
shadowman-32.xpm   shadowman-mini.png	   shadowman-round-mini.xpm
shadowman-48.png   shadowman-mini.xpm	   shadowman-transparent.png
shadowman-48.xpm   shadowman-round-32.xpm

Thanks.

Comment 10 David Zeuthen 2006-10-24 19:51:51 UTC
dfong: in addition we also need

shadowman-16.png
shadowman-20.png
shadowman-22.png
shadowman-36.png
shadowman-96.png

as redhat-artwork will symlink into these to provided themed icons for the gnome
panel menu.

Thanks. David.


Comment 11 David Zeuthen 2006-10-25 15:27:01 UTC
Actually as dfong pointed out this morning the existing shadowman
(shadownman-<size>.[png|xpm]]) are not transparent so they are not usable. So
the plan of attack is 

 1. Fixup existing icons in redhat-logos 
 2. Provide new icons shadowman-transparent-<size>.png where size=16, 20, 22,
32, 36, 48, 64, 96

then we get redhat-artwork to symlink into the shadowman-transparent-<size.png
icons.


Comment 12 David Zeuthen 2006-10-25 15:28:07 UTC
(further, we don't want to make the existing shadownman-<size>.[png|xpm] icons
transparent as that could break existing stuff)

Comment 13 Matthias Clasen 2006-10-25 15:32:37 UTC
Sounds good to me; although we should still update the existing non-transparent
shadowmen to the current approved version

Comment 14 David Zeuthen 2006-10-25 15:36:40 UTC
re comment 13, yea, that's what I meant with bullet 1. in comment 11

Comment 15 diana fong 2006-10-25 16:22:47 UTC
Created attachment 139364 [details]
Modified shadowmans from Comment 9's attachment

Comment 16 diana fong 2006-10-25 16:25:19 UTC
Created attachment 139365 [details]
Transparent Shadowmans in 16, 20, 22, 24, 32, 36, 48, 64, 96

Comment 18 David Zeuthen 2006-10-25 20:39:59 UTC
I verified these packages on Zack's x86 RHEL5 box and they looked good

Comment 20 Zack Cerza 2006-12-05 18:09:54 UTC
What version of redhat-* is this fixed in? And which shadowman should be on the
panel menu?

Comment 21 David Zeuthen 2006-12-05 18:32:31 UTC
Zack, see comment 9, comment 10 and comment 17. Thanks. 

Comment 22 Zack Cerza 2006-12-05 18:39:23 UTC
Oh, now I see the package versions. Thanks.

But the PNGs mentioned in comment 10 are not present in either redhat-logos or
redhat-artwork. Is this a problem?

Either way, the shadowman I'm seeing on the panel is round with a white face,
and a transparent border. Sound right?

Comment 23 David Zeuthen 2006-12-05 18:49:33 UTC
Sounds right. Mmm... perhaps rpmdiff can tell the files that changed? /me can't
seem to recall them at this point, sorry.

Comment 24 Zack Cerza 2006-12-05 22:06:42 UTC
Well, redhat-artwork isn't symlinking to any shadoman-* files. Does this mean we
don't need the files in comment 10?

Comment 25 David Zeuthen 2006-12-07 21:24:20 UTC
Mmmm.. I can't remember the specifics, sorry. 

Comment 26 RHEL Program Management 2006-12-23 01:35:24 UTC
A package has been built which should help the problem described in 
this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution 
of CURRENTRELEASE. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does 
not work for you.



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.