Bug 212443 - 60-fuse.rules error at boot in udev
Summary: 60-fuse.rules error at boot in udev
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 208343
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: udev
Version: 6
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Harald Hoyer
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-10-26 19:49 UTC by Mace Moneta
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-10-29 15:04:09 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mace Moneta 2006-10-26 19:49:23 UTC
Description of problem:

At boot, udev complains:

Oct 26 14:41:26 buggsb udevd[398]: add_to_rules: invalid KERNEL operation
Oct 26 14:41:26 buggsb udevd[398]: add_to_rules: invalid rule
'/etc/udev/rules.d/60-fuse.rules:1'

As a result, /dev/fuse has incorrect permissions.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

fuse-2.5.3-4.fc6

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install fuse, and a filesystem (e.g., fuse-sshfs)
2. Add a user to the fuse group
3. Reboot

  
Actual results:

Can't use fuse filesystem, because of incorrect permissions

Expected results:

Successful mount

Additional info: It looks like the syntax error is an "=" instead of an "==" in
/etc/udev/rules.d/60-fuse.rules.

Comment 1 Jason Farrell 2006-10-27 03:05:51 UTC
I see the same error at boot. a "chmod 660 /dev/fuse" allows sshfs to work
temporarily, but the udev rule needs to updated for subsequent boots.

Comment 2 Harald Hoyer 2006-10-27 07:23:16 UTC
/etc/udev/rules.d/60-fuse.rules is not part of the udev component..

Query the Component with
$ rpm -qf /etc/udev/rules.d/60-fuse.rules

Comment 3 Mace Moneta 2006-10-27 13:46:31 UTC
/etc/udev/rules.d/60-fuse.rules is part of the 'fuse' package, but bugzilla
doesn't list a fuse component, so I picked udev as the closest match.

Comment 4 Russell Harrison 2006-10-27 23:11:06 UTC
I'm also seeing this problem on the released version of FC6

Comment 5 Dawid Gajownik 2006-10-29 15:04:09 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 208343 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.