Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 2128895

Summary: Ensure httpd mod_auth* modules send multiple challenges through separate WWW-Authenticate headers
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: Aaron Ogburn <aogburn>
Component: httpdAssignee: Luboš Uhliarik <luhliari>
Status: CLOSED MIGRATED QA Contact: rhel-cs-infra-services-qe <rhel-cs-infra-services-qe>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 9.4CC: luhliari, nbhumkar, trehiopa
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: MigratedToJIRA
Target Release: ---Flags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-09-21 18:52:15 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Aaron Ogburn 2022-09-21 20:25:17 UTC
Description of problem:

Adding GssapiBasicAuth to mod_auth_gssapi results in multiple challenges in a single WWW-Authenticate header, for example:

WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate, Basic realm="Realm Name"


But that may not be handled by all client user agents.  For example firefox and curl are seen to no longer provide their kerberos ticket (https://curl.se/mail/lib-2020-01/0064.html) in this case.

A workaround can be to have mod_headers set the needed challenges in separate headers:

Header set WWW-Authenticate Negotiate
Header add WWW-Authenticate "Basic realm=\"Realm Name\""


I see by the HTTP spec, it is not wrong for a server to include multiple different challenges in WWW-Authenticate header as it is clearly allowed:

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#name-www-authenticate
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/WWW-Authenticate

"A server generating a 401 (Unauthorized) response MUST send a WWW-Authenticate header field containing at least one challenge. A server MAY generate a WWW-Authenticate header field in other response messages to indicate that supplying credentials (or different credentials) might affect the response. A proxy forwarding a response MUST NOT modify any WWW-Authenticate header fields in that response. User agents are advised to take special care in parsing the field value, as it might contain more than one challenge, and each challenge can contain a comma-separated list of authentication parameters."


So it is genuinely a bug and limitation on the client side (the browser and curl) not properly supporting and handling such a WWW-Authenticate header.  The mod_header adjustment then works around any such problem client issue.  It seems clients failing to properly implement the spec in this regard and handle multiple different challenges in one WWW-Authenticate header is a more common client issue:

"Some user agents do not recognize this form, however. As a result, sending a WWW-Authenticate field value with more than one member on the same field line might not be interoperable."


So we should consider ensuring mod_auth_gssapi and other mod_auth* modules sends challenges through separate WWW-Authenticate headers as a more universally compatible option.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 httpd-2.4.51-7.el9_0

Actual results:

Multiple challenges in a single WWW-Authenticate header may not be compatible with all client user agents


Expected results:

Multiple challenges are sent in separate WWW-Authenticate headers

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2023-09-21 18:51:51 UTC
Issue migration from Bugzilla to Jira is in process at this time. This will be the last message in Jira copied from the Bugzilla bug.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2023-09-21 18:52:15 UTC
This BZ has been automatically migrated to the issues.redhat.com Red Hat Issue Tracker. All future work related to this report will be managed there.

Due to differences in account names between systems, some fields were not replicated.  Be sure to add yourself to Jira issue's "Watchers" field to continue receiving updates and add others to the "Need Info From" field to continue requesting information.

To find the migrated issue, look in the "Links" section for a direct link to the new issue location. The issue key will have an icon of 2 footprints next to it, and begin with "RHEL-" followed by an integer.  You can also find this issue by visiting https://issues.redhat.com/issues/?jql= and searching the "Bugzilla Bug" field for this BZ's number, e.g. a search like:

"Bugzilla Bug" = 1234567

In the event you have trouble locating or viewing this issue, you can file an issue by sending mail to rh-issues. You can also visit https://access.redhat.com/articles/7032570 for general account information.