Bug 2133337 - 5.3 Beta: /bin/podman ps --format {{.Names}} exit code 125
Summary: 5.3 Beta: /bin/podman ps --format {{.Names}} exit code 125
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: Cephadm
Version: 5.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 9.1
Assignee: Adam King
QA Contact: Manasa
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-10-10 03:10 UTC by Manny
Modified: 2025-12-26 13:54 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-08-28 10:18:57 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Ceph Project Bug Tracker 51109 0 None None None 2022-10-10 03:12:33 UTC
Red Hat Bugzilla 1719626 0 urgent CLOSED podman exec rc-code needs to distinguish between stopped containers and non existing ones 2022-12-22 22:41:11 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-5419 0 None None None 2022-10-10 03:16:54 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2019:3403 0 None None None 2022-10-10 03:13:25 UTC

Comment 2 Manny 2022-10-10 15:16:29 UTC 
Thanks @adking ,

With those answers I can close out my case. If the purpose of this Beta is to find any any RGW issues, that's fine. For me, I'd like to see most issues found during a Beta Test resolved. I'll leave you with that, but know that I'm good to deal with my case.

Best regards,
Manny
Comment 4 Manny 2022-10-10 18:14:14 UTC 
Hello again @adking ,

The Tracker (https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/51109) points to this, (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/41709). In there Sage acknowledges this is a podman issue, but he then states cephadm can be modified to be resilient against this issue. Whatever you can make of that would be great. Also, if this isn't fixed/worked around in code until 5.3z1, that's more than fine.

TIA

Best regards,
Manny
Comment 15 Sahina Bose 2025-08-28 10:18:57 UTC 
Closing this bug as part of bulk closing of bugs that have been open for more than 2 years without any significant updates for the last 3 months. Please reopen with justification if you think this bug is still relevant and needs to be addressed in an upcoming release
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.