Bug 2139408
| Summary: | After reboot a RHV-H host fails to boot displaying error: ../../grub-core/loader/i386/pc/linux.c:170:invalid magic number | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Raul Aldaz <raldaz> |
| Component: | imgbased | Assignee: | Asaf Rachmani <arachman> |
| Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | peyu |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 4.4.10 | CC: | arachman, cshao, godas, lleistne, mavital, michal.skrivanek, mperina, peyu, weiwang, yaniwang |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-12-14 12:17:49 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | Integration | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Raul Aldaz
2022-11-02 12:33:44 UTC
QE tried to reproduce this bug without success.
Test version:
RHVM: 4.4.10.7-0.4.el8ev
RHVH: redhat-virtualization-host-4.4.9-202201072228_8.5
redhat-virtualization-host-4.4.10-202202081536_8.5
Test steps:
1. Install RHVH-4.4-20220110.0-RHVH-x86_64-dvd1.iso
2. Set up local repo and point to "redhat-virtualization-host-4.4.10-202202081536_8.5"
3. Add the host to RHVM
3. Upgrade the host via RHVM portal
4. Check the host status after upgrade
Test result:
The host upgrade was successful, and after rebooting, it entered the new layer rhvh-4.4.10.1-0.20220208.0+1 without any error message.
~~~~~~
# imgbase w
You are on rhvh-4.4.10.1-0.20220208.0+1
# imgbase layout
rhvh-4.4.9.4-0.20220107.0
+- rhvh-4.4.9.4-0.20220107.0+1
rhvh-4.4.10.1-0.20220208.0
+- rhvh-4.4.10.1-0.20220208.0+1
~~~~~~
Additional info:
I checked this bug you mentioned: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931443 Is the customer's environment running RHHI? Did you notice this documented workaround below? https://access.redhat.com/solutions/5829141 seems to be working on in latest version, though we're not ableto reproduce the exact scenario Please feel free to reopen if it keeps happening and there is more information |