Bug 2141723 - [DDF] It'd be better to avoid stating that all persistent volumes can be statically provisioned in OpenShift. For
Summary: [DDF] It'd be better to avoid stating that all persistent volumes can be stat...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: documentation
Version: 4.11
Hardware: All
OS: All
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Anjana Suparna Sriram
QA Contact: Neha Berry
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-11-10 15:56 UTC by Direct Docs Feedback
Modified: 2023-08-09 16:43 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2022-11-10 15:56:19 UTC 
It'd be better to avoid stating that all persistent volumes can be statically provisioned in OpenShift. For example, at the time this is being raised, ODF itself doesn't support static provisioning.

One suggestion below: 

Storage plug-ins may support static provisioning, dynamic provisioning or both provisioning types.

Reported by: vagnerfarias

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openshift_data_foundation/4.11/html/managing_and_allocating_storage_resources/managing-persistent-volume-claims_rhodf#annotations:f68dea98-73f7-41db-b87a-54300fd3ee5d
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.