Bug 2153627 - [DDF] Is this always nessacary to do? If, for example, corruption is on the software level, the device doesn't need to
Summary: [DDF] Is this always nessacary to do? If, for example, corruption is on the s...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: documentation
Version: 4.10
Hardware: All
OS: All
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Anjana Suparna Sriram
QA Contact: Neha Berry
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-12-14 23:23 UTC by Direct Docs Feedback
Modified: 2023-08-09 16:43 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2022-12-14 23:23:15 UTC 
Is this always nessacary to do? If, for example, corruption is on the software level, the device doesn't need to be removed from the node.

Reported by: rhn-support-kelwhite

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openshift_data_foundation/4.10/html/replacing_devices/openshift_data_foundation_deployed_using_local_storage_devices#annotations:3b538b6f-b4aa-465b-82b5-35f1ddb6f7dd
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.