Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 2170459

Summary:	[RFE] add docker as content type possibility for RHUI ACS
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Stefan Nemeth <snemeth>
Component:	Pulp	Assignee:	satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Satellite QE Team <sat-qe-bz-list>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.13.0	CC:	dalley, damoore, dsinglet, iballou, ipanova, lmjachky
Target Milestone:	Unspecified	Keywords:	FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2024-05-13 10:04:06 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Stefan Nemeth 2023-02-16 12:42:51 UTC

Description of problem:

Rhui4 can also host docker images, however alternative content source only supports yum as content type for repositories

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

6.13

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.content -> alternative content soucrces -> add
2.choose rhuui
3.there is only "yum" content type

Actual results:

not possible to choose docker option

Expected results:

have docker option for acs

Additional info:

Comment 1 Brad Buckingham 2023-02-16 13:51:53 UTC

Ian,

Is this supported by Pulp or would changes first need to be made there?

Thanks!

Comment 2 Ian Ballou 2023-02-16 19:18:28 UTC

Hi Brad, this is not yet supported by Pulp and would need support from them first. As such, I'll stick this on the Pulp component.

Comment 3 Daniel Alley 2023-02-23 04:09:05 UTC

I can't really visualize what ACS would look like with a container registry, do you think that sounds plausible Ina?

Comment 4 Ina Panova 2023-02-28 17:21:20 UTC

Well. It is doable but there will be some limitations. File protocol will not work. If we want to re-use things as they are designed today than one would need to create an ACS with no 'paths' and a remote pointing to a valid registry.It means that 'path' will be retrieved from the container remote object ( registry url + upstream-repo fields). As a result of 'refresh' action there will always be created one hidden repo per ACS. If we want to have a similar behavior as in RPM, where one can specify multiple paths( aka hidden repos) in ACS then changes would be needed to the ContainerRemote.

Comment 5 lmjachky 2023-11-07 18:48:47 UTC

Are there any updates on this issue? Can I see an overview of how users will benefit from this? As Ina pointed out, we are required to make additional changes on the Pulp side to support such a facility. This includes some planning.

Comment 6 Brad Buckingham 2024-03-21 21:07:37 UTC

Upon review of our valid but aging backlog the Satellite Team has concluded that this Bugzilla does not meet the criteria for a resolution in the near term, and are planning to close in a month. This message may be a repeat of a previous update and the bug is again being considered to be closed. If you have any concerns about this, please contact your Red Hat Account team.  Thank you.

Comment 7 Brad Buckingham 2024-05-13 10:04:06 UTC

Thank you for your interest in Red Hat Satellite. We have evaluated this request, and while we recognize that it is a valid request, we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. This is due to other priorities for the product, and not a reflection on the request itself. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this feel free to contact your Red Hat Account Team. Thank you.