Bug 217109 - install of RHEL4 U4 uses the “ati” driver rather than the radeon” driver
Summary: install of RHEL4 U4 uses the “ati” driver rather than the radeon” driver
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 217114
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: xorg-x11
Version: 4.4
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: X/OpenGL Maintenance List
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-11-24 03:36 UTC by LisaWu
Modified: 2007-11-17 01:14 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-02-05 14:47:11 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
this the xorg.conf that RHEL4U4 provided, it choose 'ati' rather than "radeon" driver. (2.72 KB, text/plain)
2006-11-24 03:36 UTC, LisaWu
no flags Details

Description LisaWu 2006-11-24 03:36:54 UTC
Description of problem:
an install of RHEL4 U4 64b on a ATI RN50 system would choose the “ati” driver 
rather than the “radeon” driver in xorg.conf

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.install RHEL4U4 64b on a ATI RN50(ES1000) system
2.check the xorg.conf, 

  
Actual results:
In Device section of xorg.conf, it's "ati" driver other than "radeon" driver

Expected results:
It should use "radeon" driver for my es1000 system

Additional info:
Can RH update h/w database by adding
"NAME ATI ES1000"
"DRIVER radeon" 
to the file /usr/share/hwdata/Cards

adding
"0x1002 0x515E "Card:ATI ES1000" "Card:ATI ES1000" " 
"0x1002 0x5969 "Card:ATI ES1000" "Card:ATI ES1000" " 
to the file /usr/share/hwdata/pcitable

Comment 1 LisaWu 2006-11-24 03:36:55 UTC
Created attachment 142027 [details]
this the xorg.conf that RHEL4U4 provided, it choose 'ati' rather than "radeon" driver.

Comment 2 Matěj Cepl 2007-02-05 14:47:11 UTC
per bug 217114 comment 2 this is DUPLICATE of bug 217114

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 217114 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.