Bug 217236 - epiphany-extensions 2.16.0-1 does not compile
Summary: epiphany-extensions 2.16.0-1 does not compile
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: epiphany-extensions
Version: 6
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Christopher Aillon
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-11-25 14:47 UTC by p-chan
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-12-03 12:36:07 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
rpmbuild output (10.42 KB, text/plain)
2006-11-25 14:47 UTC, p-chan
no flags Details

Description p-chan 2006-11-25 14:47:46 UTC
Description of problem:
epiphany-extensions-2.16.0-1.src.rpm does not compile.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
epiphany-extensions-2.16.0-1

How reproducible:
compile epiphany-extensions with rpmbuild

Steps to Reproduce:
1.rpmbuild --rebuild epiphany-extensions-2.16.0-1.src.rpm
2.
3.
  
Actual results:

....
....
checking which gecko to use... firefox
checking for compiler -fshort-wchar option... no
checking whether to enable C++ RTTI... no
checking whether we have a gtk 2 gecko build... configure: error: This program
needs a gtk 2 gecko build
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.74842 (%build)

Expected results:


Additional info:
I attach all the output.

Comment 1 p-chan 2006-11-25 14:47:46 UTC
Created attachment 142113 [details]
rpmbuild output

Comment 2 p-chan 2006-11-25 14:52:15 UTC
I forgot to say I try to build the package on a clean and updated FC6 install.

Comment 3 Peter Gordon 2006-12-02 17:36:59 UTC
Do you have the firefox-devel and epiphany-devel packages installed? If so, what
versions? Does it build okay through Mock for you? 

What strikes me as very odd about this bug is that it builds just fine in Mock
(tested yesterday evening as I was updating it to 2.16.1-1) and a standard
`rpmbuild --rebuild`. Therefore, the BuildRequires are correct, and it seems
that, without any more information, this might be a problem specific to your
build environment. 

Comment 4 p-chan 2006-12-03 12:36:07 UTC
With mock src builds fine. I close this bug.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.