Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
I am building a package and want to link against the system LLVM libraries, but this package requires the AVR target for LLVM. This is enabled for other versions of the build, notably in Fedora. However, I am having a hard time finding the repo that the EPEL-9 version of LLVM is built with.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
This is for the LLVM package in EPEL-9 that is providing the LLVM-15 libraries.
Notes:
This is similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718492
> However, I am having a hard time finding the repo that the EPEL-9 version of LLVM is built with.
It is a package from RHEL 9 itself, not EPEL, so you would need to make this a Red Hat product request.
The llvm13 compat package *is* in EPEL-9, so you could ask for AVR there instead, if that version suffices.
Ah yes, my mistake. Unfortunately, I require LLVM >= 15 so I can't use the LLVM 13 package. I have updated the current issue to reference RHEL 9 -> CentOS Stream. Is this okay, or should I close and create a new issue?
AVR is a hobby target -- it's not particularly stable and maintenance happens rather sporadically. I don't think it would be a good idea to include it in RHEL.
What is this target needed for?
This is for microcontroller work. I understand the hesitance to include, however. I was not aware of it's experimental status as previous compilations were done on debian-based systems where the target is enabled (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=899202).
Maybe toolbx (https://containertoolbx.org/) would suit you? Then you can easily "contain" your microcontroller work with Fedora tools on your RHEL host.
Yeah, that is definitely something to look at. I have not used toolbox in the past but if that's the recommended route to go, then I'll have to investigate.
(In reply to Rolfe Power from comment #9)
> Yeah, that is definitely something to look at. I have not used toolbox in
> the past but if that's the recommended route to go, then I'll have to
> investigate.
Ok, closing this bug then.