Bug 2184347 - [DDF] Is it not ifcfg files are deprecated, how this is still supported?
Summary: [DDF] Is it not ifcfg files are deprecated, how this is still supported?
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 2221635
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Documentation
Version: 8.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
medium
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jaroslav Klech
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-04-04 11:14 UTC by Direct Docs Feedback
Modified: 2023-07-19 07:28 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-04-04 14:35:46 UTC
Type: ---
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-153994 0 None None None 2023-04-04 11:15:23 UTC

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2023-04-04 11:14:34 UTC 
Is it not ifcfg files are deprecated, how this is still supported?

Reported by: canoz

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/8/html/configuring_and_managing_networking/consistent-network-interface-device-naming_configuring-and-managing-networking#annotations:71a9020e-9320-4c4d-bc2f-a6bfb3bc023a
Comment 2 Marc Muehlfeld 2023-07-19 07:26:58 UTC 
It's valid feedback. 

I added a similar comment to a GDoc (https://docs.google.com/document/d/15qqgMPPbtO-4rA-js4fk9q9Scb9DObtZ6c_sh4gROew/edit?disco=AAAAuVy5xrs) a while ago: It is also about ifcfg deprecation and the new keyfile format, because our docs are not clear about the changes.

This will be implemented as part of the revision of the "Consistent device naming" chapter (see https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHELPLAN-137138).
Comment 3 Marc Muehlfeld 2023-07-19 07:28:10 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2221635 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.