Bug 2186729 - [DDF] Why are we referring to RHCS-2 and RHCS-3 in the RHCS-6 docs? didn't they both go EOL a long time ago ?
Summary: [DDF] Why are we referring to RHCS-2 and RHCS-3 in the RHCS-6 docs? didn't th...
Keywords:
Status: RELEASE_PENDING
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: Documentation
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
: Backlog
Assignee: Akash Raj
QA Contact: Manisha Saini
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-04-14 09:28 UTC by Direct Docs Feedback
Modified: 2023-08-10 04:32 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-6588 0 None None None 2023-04-28 10:42:04 UTC

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2023-04-14 09:28:11 UTC 
Why are we referring to RHCS-2 and RHCS-3 in the RHCS-6 docs? didn't they both go EOL a long time ago ?

Reported by: rh-ee-hemoller

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_ceph_storage/6/html/object_gateway_guide/considerations-and-recommendations#annotations:283dd9fb-1d11-41ab-a723-08a57d79ba4d
Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2023-04-14 09:28:21 UTC 
Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.