User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/111.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Build Identifier: Please branch and build docbook5-style-xsl in epel8. If you do not wish to maintain docbook5-style-xsl in epel8, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/docbook5-style-xsl/addgroup and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches. My proposal would be to build the CentOS Stream 8 version from https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=251 (which should be the same, except more %changelog entries, like in CentOS Stream 9). Reproducible: Always Actual Results: No docbook5-style-xsl in any regular CentOS Stream 8 repository nor in EPEL 8. Expected Results: docbook5-style-xsl-1.79.2-5.el8 ;-)
Will you be able to branch and build docbook5-style-xsl in epel8? The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build it on epel8.
Hi, I'm sorry for the late respond. I will branch it asap.
From what I can see, the epel8 branch has not been requested, yet.
@redhat-bugzilla I'm currently questioning if it is a good idea to branch it as it is in RHEL8 build root. There is no specific approach to solving this issue or if it matters. I'm consulting this with a collage.
I actually need docbook5-style-xsl for a 3rd-party package. Regarding RHEL 8 buildroot: Please see bug #2090958 - the same situation also existed for elinks and was clarified there by your colleagues.
I'm sorry for the wait, and thank you for your info. Build for EPEL8: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101159441 Koji: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-74508fc5cd
I'm not sure whether -15 was a good idea, because now there will be newer NEVRA in EPEL 8 than in CentOS Stream 9 (which breaks possible inplace upgrade paths from RHEL 8 to 9). This is why I suggested to use -5 (like the Koji build in CentOS Stream 8).
I unpushed the package and lowered the version. You have a good point about the upgrade path; thank you for the suggestion.
Available with https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-9856fbab6d