Bug 2188866 - Remove bash completion for javaws
Summary: Remove bash completion for javaws
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Classification: Red Hat
Component: bash-completion
Version: 9.1
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: 9.2
Assignee: Siteshwar Vashisht
QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-04-23 00:29 UTC by Robert Scheck
Modified: 2023-07-18 08:09 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 2188865 0 unspecified ASSIGNED Remove bash completion for javaws 2023-08-16 08:09:05 UTC
Red Hat Bugzilla 2188867 0 medium CLOSED Review Request: icedtea-web - Open Source implementation of JSR-56 better known as Java Web Start 2023-06-24 01:44:15 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-155445 0 None None None 2023-04-23 00:30:55 UTC

Description Robert Scheck 2023-04-23 00:29:14 UTC 
Description of problem:
IcedTea-Web is absent in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9, but bash-completion-2.11-4.el9 still ships a completion file for it (while IcedTea-Web ships its own completion file if installed manually; latter even leads to a file conflict then).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
bash-completion-2.11-4.el9

How reproducible:
Everytime, see below.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -qvl bash-completion | grep /javaws

Actual results:
/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/javaws

Expected results:
No more /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/javaws

Additional info:
Bug #2188865 is the same report for Fedora (as RHEL upstream).
Comment 1 Siteshwar Vashisht 2023-06-16 09:39:35 UTC 
I am removing needinfo as I need to follow up on Fedora first (bug 2188865).
Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2023-06-17 22:53:20 UTC 
Pull request in bug #2188865 comment #4 got merged for Fedora, thus it should be fine for RHEL 9.3, too?
Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2023-07-17 17:05:12 UTC 
Siteshwar, what prevents this bug report from being worked on for RHEL 9.3?
Comment 4 Siteshwar Vashisht 2023-07-18 08:09:42 UTC 
> Siteshwar, what prevents this bug report from being worked on for RHEL 9.3?

We need qa_ack on this bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.