Bug 2208280 - [OCP tracker-14191][RDR] Subscription already exists error is seen while installing ODF/MCO operator [NEEDINFO]
Summary: [OCP tracker-14191][RDR] Subscription already exists error is seen while inst...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: unclassified
Version: 4.13
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Mudit Agarwal
QA Contact: Elad
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-05-18 13:26 UTC by Aman Agrawal
Modified: 2025-08-05 08:29 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:
muagarwa: needinfo? (kramdoss)


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker OCPBUGS-14191 0 None None None 2023-08-11 15:38:39 UTC

Description Aman Agrawal 2023-05-18 13:26:51 UTC
Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log
snippests):
When installing MCO operator for the 1st time on a fresh new cluster, subscription already exists error is seen though it proceeds with the installation.

Version of all relevant components (if applicable):
ODF 4.13.0-201.stable


Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product
(please explain in detail what is the user impact)?


Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge?


Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this
bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)?


Can this issue reproducible?


Can this issue reproduce from the UI?


If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install MCO operator on OCP 4.13
2.
3.


Actual results: Subscription already exists error is seen while installing MCO operator


Expected results: As installtion is being done on a fresh new setup, the error shouldn't be seen.


Additional info:

Comment 3 umanga 2023-05-23 12:13:12 UTC
Need more info on where and when we see the error and the logs.
What's the exact version of OCP 4.13?
If everything works even after the error, it's not a blocker at least.

Comment 12 Mudit Agarwal 2023-08-11 15:37:26 UTC
Hi Aman,

Thanks for providing the steps to the OCP team.
The thing I don't understand is, how is this related to only internal builds and if let's say that is the case then why to fix it because we will not hit this issue in the field?

Comment 13 Aman Agrawal 2023-08-14 08:04:07 UTC
(In reply to Mudit Agarwal from comment #12)
> Hi Aman,
> 
> Thanks for providing the steps to the OCP team.
> The thing I don't understand is, how is this related to only internal builds
> and if let's say that is the case then why to fix it because we will not hit
> this issue in the field?

I haven't tested so not sure if we hit the issue on GA'ed build or not. @kramdoss, is it possible to ask someone to take it up and then decide/close it?

Comment 15 Aman Agrawal 2023-09-22 08:02:07 UTC
Not a blocker, moving out.

Comment 17 umanga 2024-05-10 09:00:46 UTC
Since this is not specific to any one operator and an OCP issue, I'm moving it to "unclassified" component.
We should probably just close this BZ and track the Jira issue.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.