On f38, linphone does not install anymore. dnf install linphone results in Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides ortp(x86-32) >= 1:0.22.0 needed by linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.i686 from fedora - nothing provides libortp.so.9 needed by linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.i686 from fedora - nothing provides libortp.so.9()(64bit) needed by linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.x86_64 from fedora - nothing provides ortp(x86-64) >= 1:0.22.0 needed by linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.x86_64 from fedoraortp (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) seems to be dependency issue: ortp is not available in f38. there is a ortp package in updates-testing repo, but even with "--enablerepo=updates-testing", I do get: Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides ortp(x86-32) >= 1:0.22.0 needed by linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.i686 from fedora - nothing provides libortp.so.9 needed by linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.i686 from fedora - nothing provides libortp.so.9()(64bit) needed by linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.x86_64 from fedora Why does dnf wants to install any .i686 arch package for linphone? Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. sudo dnf install linphone or 2. sudo dnf install linphone --enablerepo=updates-testing 3. Actual Results: missing dependencies
getting rid of the .i686 trial... sudo dnf install linphone.x86_64 1 Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides libortp.so.9()(64bit) needed by linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.x86_64 from fedora (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
workaround: 1.) sudo dnf install https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/ortp/0.23.0/8.fc35/x86_64/ortp-0.23.0-8.fc35.x86_64.rpm 2.) sudo dnf install linphone.x86_64
The workaround explains why linphone is still running after I did system-upgrade to f38.
I forgot to mention that I removed linphone before upgrading from f37 to f38 because of the following dependency issue. (I thought I deal with the issue after upgrading.) Problem 1: package linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.x86_64 from @System requires libeXosip2.so.7()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both libeXosip2-5.3.0-2.fc38.x86_64 from updates and libeXosip2-3.6.0-29.fc38.x86_64 from @System - cannot install both libeXosip2-5.3.0-2.fc38.x86_64 from updates and libeXosip2-3.6.0-29.fc38.x86_64 from fedora - cannot install the best update candidate for package linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package libeXosip2-3.6.0-29.fc38.x86_64 Problem 2: Problem with installed package linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.x86_64 - package linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.x86_64 from @System requires libosip2.so.7()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.x86_64 from @System requires libosipparser2.so.7()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.x86_64 from fedora requires libosip2.so.7()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.x86_64 from fedora requires libosipparser2.so.7()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both libosip2-5.3.1-1.fc38.x86_64 from updates and libosip2-3.6.0-25.fc38.x86_64 from @System - cannot install both libosip2-5.3.1-1.fc38.x86_64 from updates and libosip2-3.6.0-25.fc38.x86_64 from fedora - cannot install the best update candidate for package libosip2-3.6.0-25.fc38.x86_64 So this is the exact same dependency error message, I am receiving now in f38 (after having upgraded to f38 and installed the .fc35 package of ortp, version 0.23) Problem 1: package linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.x86_64 from @System requires libeXosip2.so.7()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both libeXosip2-5.3.0-2.fc38.x86_64 from updates and libeXosip2-3.6.0-29.fc38.x86_64 from @System - cannot install both libeXosip2-5.3.0-2.fc38.x86_64 from updates and libeXosip2-3.6.0-29.fc38.x86_64 from fedora - cannot install the best update candidate for package linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package libeXosip2-3.6.0-29.fc38.x86_64 Problem 2: problem with installed package linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.x86_64 - package linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.x86_64 from @System requires libosip2.so.7()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.x86_64 from @System requires libosipparser2.so.7()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.x86_64 from fedora requires libosip2.so.7()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package linphone-3.6.1-50.fc38.x86_64 from fedora requires libosipparser2.so.7()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both libosip2-5.3.1-1.fc38.x86_64 from updates and libosip2-3.6.0-25.fc38.x86_64 from @System - cannot install both libosip2-5.3.1-1.fc38.x86_64 from updates and libosip2-3.6.0-25.fc38.x86_64 from fedora - cannot install the best update candidate for package libosip2-3.6.0-25.fc38.x86_64 ============================================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Package Architecture Version Repository Size ============================================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Skipping packages with conflicts: (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): libeXosip2 x86_64 5.3.0-2.fc38 updates 171 k libosip2 x86_64 5.3.1-1.fc38 updates 115 k Transaction Summary ============================================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Skip 2 Packages
any news on this?
*** Bug 2216200 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Bug 2175123 said on 2023-03-10: This is a long term failure (years) that will be addressed hopefully in the 39 cycle. I do not have the time nor resources to fix this for the upcoming 38. Bug 2175119 said on 2023-06-26: This package has been orphaned. Apparently someone has to do the work.