Bug 2217277 - [DDF] The compatibility with Red Hat OpenStack Platform is not mentioned here in this CEPH6 compatibility matrix (both
Summary: [DDF] The compatibility with Red Hat OpenStack Platform is not mentioned here...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: Documentation
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 6.1z1
Assignee: Ranjini M N
QA Contact: Manisha Saini
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2216904
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-06-25 22:17 UTC by Direct Docs Feedback
Modified: 2023-08-28 07:31 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-08-28 07:31:48 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-6917 0 None None None 2023-06-25 22:18:35 UTC

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2023-06-25 22:17:40 UTC 
The compatibility with Red Hat OpenStack Platform is not mentioned here in this CEPH6 compatibility matrix (both for ceph6.0 and 6.1).

I see it is present for CEPH5.x (https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_ceph_storage/5/html/compatibility_guide/compatibility-matrix-for-red-hat-ceph-storage-5-3).

Does it mean that CEPH6.x is not compatible with current RHOSP16.2 release (need to know for both director deployed and external ceph)?
Also, it will be good to know that what is the plan for RHOSP17.1? 

Reported by: rhn-support-shtiwari

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_ceph_storage/6/html/compatibility_guide/compatibility-matrix-for-red-hat-ceph-storage-6-1#annotations:8bdb0bb4-72a2-4d22-92c6-8319f732ccee
Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2023-06-25 22:17:48 UTC 
Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.