Bug 2217827 - [DOC] [RFE] Job review details should contain scheduling information
Summary: [DOC] [RFE] Job review details should contain scheduling information
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Remote Execution
Version: 6.14.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: Aneta Šteflová Petrová
QA Contact: Satellite QE Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-06-27 08:10 UTC by Aneta Šteflová Petrová
Modified: 2023-06-28 12:48 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-06-28 12:48:04 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Aneta Šteflová Petrová 2023-06-27 08:10:48 UTC
This bug was initially created as a copy of Bug #2158510

I am copying this bug because: 

This update is to be evaluated for doc impact.

Description of problem:
In the new Rex wizard, the Review page does not contain details about future execution or recurring execution settings.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.13 snap 4

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Schedule a rex job through new UI wizard
2. Set either future or recurring execution and specify some details on the related steps (e.g. starts at, ends after x occurrences...)
3. Get to the last step, almost all settings are listed but these scheduling details are not

Comment 3 Aneta Šteflová Petrová 2023-06-28 11:03:16 UTC
The existing procedure (see c#2) does not need updating; it still applies as it is.

The update described in the web UI (additional details about a rex job) doesn't need any additional explaining in the documentation.

Comment 4 Aneta Šteflová Petrová 2023-06-28 11:04:22 UTC
Adam, are you okay with *not* documenting these changes? See my explanation in comment#3.

Comment 5 Adam Ruzicka 2023-06-28 11:23:50 UTC
Yes, I'd be fine with that

Comment 6 Aneta Šteflová Petrová 2023-06-28 12:48:04 UTC
Nothing to document here.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.