Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 2222265

Summary: Redis is getting installed with the default RHUA installation but seems to be being used
Product: Red Hat Update Infrastructure for Cloud Providers Reporter: mithun kalyat <mkalyat>
Component: RHUAAssignee: Gregg Tanzillo <gtanzill>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Radek Bíba <rbiba>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.1.1CC: johannes.schischke, mminar
Target Milestone: 4.6.0Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: 4.x   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-11-01 06:39:16 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description mithun kalyat 2023-07-12 13:27:08 UTC
Description of problem:

Why a redis database is getting installed with the default RHUI installation? It seems to being used. Can this package be removed?

[root@rhua proc]# ss -antpl |grep redis
LISTEN 0      511        127.0.0.1:6379       0.0.0.0:*    users:(("redis-server",pid=949,fd=6))

[root@rhua02 proc]# ps -ef |grep redis
redis        949       1  0 May05 ?        02:07:14 /usr/bin/redis-server 127.0.0.1:6379

### no database configured
[root@rhua proc]# redis-cli info keyspace
# Keyspace

# data location is empty
[root@rhua proc]# redis-cli config get dir
1) "dir"
2) "/var/lib/redis"
[root@rhua proc]# ll /var/lib/redis/
total 0

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2023-11-01 06:39:16 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (RHUI 4.6.0 bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:6225