Bug 222618 (llk) - Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet
Summary: Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: llk
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-01-15 10:11 UTC by kingyipan
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-06-09 17:46:43 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description kingyipan 2007-01-15 10:11:39 UTC
Spec URL: ftp://fedora:arodef@218.210.26.83/llk.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://fedora:arodef@218.210.26.83/llk_linux-2.2-1lp.src.rpm
Description: 

A popular game.
  To get a sponsor.

Comment 1 kingyipan 2007-01-15 10:17:57 UTC
I'm working with rpm.I want to becom a fedora extras contributor.

Comment 2 Chitlesh GOORAH 2007-01-15 10:35:26 UTC
hmm can you have a look at the fedora packaging guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines

Read them and do the appropriate corrections

Comment 3 kingyipan 2007-01-19 01:56:07 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> hmm can you have a look at the fedora packaging guidelines:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines
> 
> Read them and do the appropriate corrections
Thanks for your comment, I'm sorry for my abruptness review request;
I would read the fedora packageing guideline more seriousely,although i had read
them one time befor.

Comment 4 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-02-10 14:16:25 UTC
Umm??

Comment 5 Nigel Jones 2007-04-27 09:37:25 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> Umm??

I think Mamoru wanted to say that if you would like to see a package in Fedora
it MUST (and I really stress MUST) meet all Package Guidelines, it MUST also be
updated when required to ensure it meets all changes to Package Guidelines.

I suggest you read the links provided in Comment #2 and look at other review
requests to see what is expected.

Comment 6 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-05-24 15:58:31 UTC
ping again?

Comment 7 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-05-31 18:19:58 UTC
I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received
from the submitter within ONE WEEK.

Comment 8 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-06-09 17:46:43 UTC
CLOSING.

If someone want to maintain this package, please file 
a new review request, thank you.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.