Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 2226794 - Satellite documentation does not indicate the required fields for custom certificates
Summary: Satellite documentation does not indicate the required fields for custom cert...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Certificates
Version: 6.14.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
urgent
urgent
Target Milestone: 6.14.0
Assignee: Malhar Jivrajani
QA Contact: Satellite QE Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 2236329 2244880 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-07-26 14:41 UTC by Ganesh Payelkar
Modified: 2024-02-28 20:32 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-11-21 10:56:58 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker SAT-19186 0 None None None 2023-07-26 14:41:49 UTC

Comment 1 Eric Helms 2023-07-27 13:52:48 UTC
I think we should add to our docs some of the known requirements for custom certificates to help guide customers. These requirements are captured in our katello-certs-check tool:

 * Certificates should be PEM encoded
 * Certificate should not also be CA certificate (No CA:TRUE flag)
 * The private key cannot have a passphrase
 * Certificate should include a Subject Alt Name (SAN) entry that matches the Common Name (CN)
 * Certificate should allow for Key Encipherment (via Key Usage extension)
 * Certificate cannot have a shortname as the Common Name (CN)

Comment 5 Eric Helms 2023-09-07 13:16:25 UTC
*** Bug 2236329 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Malhar Jivrajani 2023-10-31 08:58:35 UTC
*** Bug 2244880 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.