Bug 2230140 - [RFE] Incremental exports should allow arbitrary dates
Summary: [RFE] Incremental exports should allow arbitrary dates
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Content Views
Version: 6.12.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: satellite6-bugs
QA Contact: Satellite QE Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-08-08 18:59 UTC by Jessica Richards
Modified: 2023-08-11 15:35 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker SAT-19512 0 None None None 2023-08-11 15:35:10 UTC

Description Jessica Richards 2023-08-08 18:59:00 UTC
1. Proposed title of this feature request

[RFE] Incremental exports should allow arbitrary dates

3. What is the nature and description of the request?

The customer would like to be able to create incremental exports with an arbitrary date (rather than a version number) using the "--since" option.


4. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

Personal preference.  The customer was able to do this in Satellite 6.9, and they enjoyed that experience.


5. How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)

Add a "--since" option to the hammer command to allow (at least) incremental content exports of both the Library and of content views


6. For each functional requirement listed, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.

- sync an older repository
- republish a content view containing that repository
- export the library, and also the content view
- check the package versions to verify that none of them are older than the "since" date

7. Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat Bugzilla?

no

8. Does the customer have any specific timeline dependencies and which release would they like to target (i.e. RHEL8, RHEL9)?

no

9. Is the sales team involved in this request and do they have any additional input?

no

10. List any affected packages or components.

pulp

11. Would the customer be able to assist in testing this functionality if implemented?

.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.