Bug 2232517 - The RHEL version of the gcc-toolset-12 metapackage is newer than the CentOS version
Summary: The RHEL version of the gcc-toolset-12 metapackage is newer than the CentOS v...
Keywords:
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Classification: Red Hat
Component: gcc-toolset-12
Version: CentOS Stream
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Marek Polacek
QA Contact: qe-baseos-tools-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-08-17 08:33 UTC by Nick Clifton
Modified: 2023-08-17 15:44 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-165956 0 None None None 2023-08-17 08:37:43 UTC

Description Nick Clifton 2023-08-17 08:33:11 UTC
Comment 1 Nick Clifton 2023-08-17 08:37:13 UTC 
CentOS has:  gcc-toolset-12-runtime-12.0-5
RHEL has:    gcc-toolset-12-12.0-6

This matters because the -6 release has support for the gcc generated version of the annobin plugin.  cf:

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216918#c25
Comment 2 Nick Clifton 2023-08-17 08:38:22 UTC 
Doh - please ignore the "runtime" in the comparison above.  The "runtime" is rpm is just part of the meta package.
Comment 3 Marek Polacek 2023-08-17 12:59:28 UTC 
Confirmed (both rhel 8 and 9) but we don't even have the appropriate branches.

Is this to be fixed in RHEL 9.4/8.10 or 9.3/8.9?
Comment 4 Nick Clifton 2023-08-17 13:20:07 UTC 
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> Confirmed (both rhel 8 and 9) but we don't even have the appropriate
> branches.
> 
> Is this to be fixed in RHEL 9.4/8.10 or 9.3/8.9?

I think both, plus possibly 9.2 and 9.1 and 8.8 as well.

The thing is, this is for GTS-12, which spans multiple releases of RHEL, and needs to work on all of them.  So this probably going to be a y-stream fix for 9.3/8.9 and a z-stream fix for the earlier releases.  Although since we are now so close to exception/blocker time, maybe it will have to be a y-stream fix for 9.4/8.10 and a z-stream for the others.
Comment 5 Marek Polacek 2023-08-17 14:10:55 UTC 
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #4)
> (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> > Confirmed (both rhel 8 and 9) but we don't even have the appropriate
> > branches.
> > 
> > Is this to be fixed in RHEL 9.4/8.10 or 9.3/8.9?
> 
> I think both, plus possibly 9.2 and 9.1 and 8.8 as well.

I suppose I'm going to have to ask for all these branches to be created...

> The thing is, this is for GTS-12, which spans multiple releases of RHEL, and
> needs to work on all of them.  So this probably going to be a y-stream fix
> for 9.3/8.9 and a z-stream fix for the earlier releases.  Although since we
> are now so close to exception/blocker time, maybe it will have to be a
> y-stream fix for 9.4/8.10 and a z-stream for the others.

...and depending on how fast they are created, the y-stream will be determined.
Comment 6 Marek Polacek 2023-08-17 14:58:14 UTC 
Actually, I don't think we need z-streams for CentOS, just a y-stream branch.
Comment 7 Marek Polacek 2023-08-17 14:59:28 UTC 
Created https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CS-1710
Comment 8 Marek Polacek 2023-08-17 15:44:17 UTC 
But the branches also don't exist in RHEL so I guess I'll need *another* ticket.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.