Description of problem:


Satellite 6.12 has two different pages for host views, "All Hosts" and "Content Hosts." All Hosts has a "Last Report" column, and Content Hosts have a "Last Checkin" column. Last Checkin shows an up-to-date timestamp, while the Last Report is blank. This discrepancy between the two pages is confusing to us for monitoring purposes. Can you please reconcile this difference, or remove one of them? 

customer does not have Puppet installed on this Satellite server and does not plan on installing or using Puppet.




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Red Hat Satellite 6.12


Actual results:

- Remove the extra columns from the satellite GUI

Expected results:


Additional info:

 
1. Proposed title of this feature request :

--> Remove the extra column from the Satellite GUI 


2. What is the nature and description of the request?

--> Satellite 6.12 has two different pages for host views, "All Hosts" and "Content Hosts." All Hosts has a "Last Report" column, and Content Hosts have a "Last Checkin" column. Last Checkin shows an up-to-date timestamp, while the Last Report is blank. This discrepancy between the two pages is confusing to us for monitoring purposes.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

--> Getting confusion while monitoring 

4. How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)

--> By removing the extra column (Last Report)

5. For each functional requirement listed, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.

--> By checking that column is removed or not.

6. Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat Bugzilla?

--> No

7. Does the customer have any specific timeline dependencies and which release would they like to target (i.e. RHEL8, RHEL9)?

-->NO

8. Is the sales team involved in this request and do they have any additional input?

--> NO

9. List any affected packages or components.

--> NA

10. Would the customer be able to assist in testing this functionality if implemented?

--> Yes, but not sure as the case has been closed