Bug 223746 - Review Request: epiphany-extensions-epilicious
Summary: Review Request: epiphany-extensions-epilicious
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Peter Gordon
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-01-22 04:09 UTC by Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-03-03 01:57:01 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal 2007-01-22 04:09:58 UTC
Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/epiphany-extensions-epilicious.spec
SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/epiphany-extensions-epilicious-0.10.2-1.fc6.src.rpm

Description: 

Epilicious is an extension for the Epiphany web browser that lets you 
synchronise Epiphany and Delicious bookmarks.

Package builds in mock. 

rpmlint output: 
E: epiphany-extensions-epilicious only-non-binary-in-usr-lib

This package places files, including files that really should be in /usr/share, into the epiphany extention dir, which is in /usr/lib/epiphany/extensions/. The epiphany-extensions package itself does put data files in /usr/share, but I haven't been able to make this extension work doing that. Ignoring this rpmlint message is therefor the only solution I've been able to find. Suggestions are very welcome.

Comment 1 Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal 2007-01-22 04:11:38 UTC
Upstream tarball is not including a copy of the GPL, don't know if this is a
blocker or not. I have contacted upstream trying to change this. README refers
to an online copy of the GPL.

Comment 2 Peter Gordon 2007-03-03 01:57:01 UTC
Hi, Sindre.

The epiplicious extension is included as part of the upstream
epiphany-extensions package version 2.17.92 (which I will push to the build
system in a couple of hours after my mock-build testing succeeds). 

Therefore, I'm going to close this bug as UPSTREAM. Thanks for your efforts in
getting this packaged though! :)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.