Bug 224244 - Review Request: gaim
Review Request: gaim
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-01-24 15:19 EST by Warren Togami
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-07-24 05:11:04 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Warren Togami 2007-01-24 15:19:42 EST
Requesting review in preparation for the Fedora merge.  I would really like to maintain single spec support all Fedora plus RHEL3+.  It has been easier to maintain in this fashion, and most importantly, the spec hasn't got out of hand with crazy stuff.  Cleanup recommendations are welcome.


Gaim allows you to talk to anyone using a variety of messaging 
protocols, including AIM (Oscar and TOC), ICQ, IRC, Yahoo!, 
MSN Messenger, Jabber, Gadu-Gadu, Napster, and Zephyr.  These 
protocols are implemented using a modular, easy to use design.  
To use a protocol, just add an account using the account editor.

Gaim supports many common features of other clients, as well as many 
unique features, such as perl scripting and C plugins.

Gaim is NOT affiliated with or endorsed by America Online, Inc., 
Microsoft Corporation, or Yahoo! Inc. or other messaging service 
Comment 1 Michael Schwendt 2007-01-24 17:47:56 EST
> %post 
> /sbin/ldconfig -n %{_libdir}/gaim
> %postun
> /sbin/ldconfig -n %{_libdir}/gaim

These two don't do anything useful.

> %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/gaim.schemas

Why are these not installed/uninstalled with gconftool-2?
Comment 2 Peter Lemenkov 2007-06-04 15:27:19 EDT
Pidgin is already in Fedora. Somebody should close this bug.
Comment 3 Jason Tibbitts 2007-06-05 18:27:17 EDT
This was actually an early merge review.  My question is whether it's still
relevant given the package rename.
Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2007-07-13 10:52:14 EDT
Any chance someone could say definitively whether this ticket needs a review or
should be closed?
Comment 5 Peter Lemenkov 2007-07-24 05:11:04 EDT
I vote for closing this bug. There is no such application.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.