Fedora Merge Review: aspell-da
Can you update SPEC as suggested in other aspell package reviews?
I saw new tarball available on upstream site aspell5-da-1.4.42-1.tar.gz2.
Can you update source in SPEC?
Thank you for your notice, fixed in aspell-da-1.4.42-1.fc7.i386.rpm.
package builds in mock (development i386).
- rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and RPM.
But following messages are ignorable
E: aspell-da no-binary
E: aspell-da only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
E: aspell-da configure-without-libdir-spec
+ SPEC file contains explanation about above warnings.
+ source files match upstream.
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required.
+ %doc does not affect runtime.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Dose owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Requires: aspell >= 12:0.60
+ Provides: aspell-da = 50:1.4.42-1.fc7
+ Not a GUI APP.
As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review.