Fedora Merge Review: aspell-nl http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/aspell-nl/
Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). - rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and RPM. W: aspell-nl incoherent-version-in-changelog -51:0.1e-4 51:0.1e-4.fc7 You can do this at next release also. But following messages are ignorable E: aspell-nl no-binary E: aspell-nl only-non-binary-in-usr-lib E: aspell-nl configure-without-libdir-spec + SPEC file contains explanation about above warnings. + source files match upstream. c9b63f9e0f754cc593d4c6233c2d5730 dutch_0.1e.orig.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Requires: aspell >= 12:0.60 + Provides: aspell-nl = 51:0.1e-4.fc7 + Not a GUI APP. APPROVED.
As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review.