Fedora Merge Review: aspell-sl
Can you update SPEC of this package similar to one that I have attached for
Review Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225266?
Also, Change Buildroot and add disttag(its optional)
W: aspell-sl summary-ended-with-dot Slovenian dictionaries for Aspell.
Summary ends with a dot.
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
- rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and RPM.
But following messages are ignorable
E: aspell-sl no-binary
E: aspell-sl only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
E: aspell-sl configure-without-libdir-spec
+ SPEC file contains explanation about above warnings.
+ source files match upstream.
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required.
+ %doc does not affect runtime.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Dose owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Requires: aspell >= 12:0.60
+ Provides: aspell-sl = 50:0.50-2.fc7
+ Not a GUI APP.
As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review.