Bug 226334 - Merge Review: pykickstart
Summary: Merge Review: pykickstart
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review   
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Cantrell
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2007-01-31 20:45 UTC by Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Modified: 2009-09-21 20:17 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-06-11 17:22:38 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
dcantrell: fedora-review+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 20:45:26 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: pykickstart

Initial Owner: clumens@redhat.com

Comment 1 David Cantrell 2007-06-08 20:15:55 UTC
Initial rpmlint run:

W: pykickstart macro-in-%changelog ksappend

Comment 2 David Cantrell 2007-06-08 20:22:38 UTC
The following:
%{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(python -c "from distutils.sysconfig
import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")}

Should be:
%{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")}

Comment 3 David Cantrell 2007-06-08 20:24:33 UTC
The Source0 field should contain the URL to the downloadable source or a comment
like this above it:

# This is a Red Hat maintained package which is specific to
# our distribution.  Thus the source is only available from
# within this srpm.

Comment 4 Chris Lumens 2007-06-08 21:15:28 UTC
Not going to fix the rpmlint warning because pykickstart is special, and that
refers to the %ksappend section in the file format.  The other two are fixed in

Comment 5 David Cantrell 2007-06-11 17:22:38 UTC
Sounds good to me.  Closing.

Comment 6 Jason Tibbitts 2007-06-20 16:54:49 UTC
Hmm, fedora-review is still set to '?'.  If this was approved, could someone
(preferrably the person who approved it) set it to '+'?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.