Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 226513
Merge Review: units
Last modified: 2007-11-30 17:11:55 EST
Fedora Merge Review: units
Initial Owner: firstname.lastname@example.org
I'd be happy to review this package... look for a full review in a bit.
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPL)
OK - License field in spec matches
See below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
See below - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
See below - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
See below - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane:
OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described.
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
0 outstanding bugs - check for outstanding bugs on package.
1. Might include in %doc:
ChangeLog COPYING NEWS README
2. Buildroot should be the default one:
3. rpmlint says:
rpmlint on units-1.86-3.fc7.src.rpm
W: units summary-ended-with-dot A utility for converting amounts from one unit
Suggest: remove . at the end of summary.
W: units no-url-tag
Suggest: add a "URL: http://www.gnu.org/software/units/units.html"
W: units prereq-use /sbin/install-info
Suggest: remove the "Prereq: /sbin/install-info" and replace per
4. Don't use %makeinstall, instead use 'make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install'
5. Possible missing Buildrequires?
checking for sin... no
checking for tparm in -lncurses... no
checking for tgetent in -ltermcap... no
checking for readline in -lreadline... no
Once you have addressed these items (either by making the suggested changes, or
by explaining why they don't make sense), please reassign this review back
to me, and change the 'fedora-review' flag back to ? for me to take action.
Resetting flags and such per the new offical review guidelines.
please check units-1.86-5.fc7
Excellent. I see no further blockers... so this package is APPROVED.
You can go ahead and close this RAWHIDE once it's been pushed out into rawhide.
Closing this since it's been checked in and shipped a while back.