Bug 227539 - Missing package beryl-plugins-unsupported
Summary: Missing package beryl-plugins-unsupported
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: beryl-plugins   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 6
Hardware: All Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jarod Wilson
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: Reopened
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-02-06 19:31 UTC by Jared Brown
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-02-23 21:58:04 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jared Brown 2007-02-06 19:31:41 UTC
Description of problem:

As of Release: 0.1.9999.1 the Beryl project has split the plugins and now
maintains unsupported plugins in a separate archive. These plugins are missing
in Extras. There should be a package for beryl-plugins-unsupported.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.1.9999.1

Comment 1 Jarod Wilson 2007-02-06 19:45:19 UTC
Based on the name of the package and its README (included below), I'm somewhat
inclined to say no thank you to packaging these bits up... Is there really a
compelling reason to do this? I suppose if they're in their own package that
people have to manually install (i.e., not sucked in by beryl-gnome or
beryl-kde), it wouldn't hurt too much...

----8<----
Beryl extra plugins:

this module contains plugins that are either:
* unstable
* only modestly maintained
* or completely unmaintained

We don't want to drop them, and will do baseline maintenance to make sure
they compile (should they be unmaintained).

We hope to get them maintained or stabilized, and pulled back into -plugins.

THESE ARE NOT MEANT FOR PRODUCTION SYSTEMS!

THESE ARE UNSUPPORTED OFFICIALLY!

Use at your own risk.
----8<----

Comment 2 Jarod Wilson 2007-02-22 21:58:32 UTC
Due to lack of a compelling reason to package the -unsupported beryl plugins,
closing WONTFIX.

Comment 3 Jared Brown 2007-02-23 00:44:20 UTC
I suggest that this bug be revisited and have therefore reopened it. I agree
that the package shouldn't be required by any other packages due to its nature.
This package would provide additional features to a user. It is preferred that
it is provided via a repository. This is attractive to users such as myself who
were happily using certain plugins that until recently were part of the standard
plugin set. The package would be clearly named as unsupported so users would be
informed of what they are installing. In my experience the plugins provided were
stable and provided attractive features. Part of the fun of Beryl is to be able
to play around with these new features and plugins. By including this package
users will be able to try these plugins out and possibly decide to take over
their maintenance.

Comment 4 Jarod Wilson 2007-02-23 21:58:04 UTC
Okay, fine, but you get to pick up the pieces. :)

New build including unsupported forthcoming...

Comment 5 Jared Brown 2007-02-23 22:10:38 UTC
Great! :)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.