Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 227909 - save to remote host should have port option field
save to remote host should have port option field
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: anaconda (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Chris Lumens
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-02-08 16:17 EST by ericm24x7
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-02-26 15:27:54 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description ericm24x7 2007-02-08 16:17:43 EST
Description of problem:

When an exception occurred during installation, the option to "Save to Remote
Host" should have a field for custom Port number ( i.e. "-P 6604" ), since not
every configured remote hosts use the default port of "22" for "scp". 

The option to "Save to Remote Host" is not possible when the remote host is
using a port other than the default port (22).

Additional info:

Better solution would be to add a "Port" field option. Assumed default port "22"
if user did not supply an port number (or kept it blank).
Comment 2 Chris Lumens 2007-02-26 15:27:54 EST
The "save to remote" dialog now has a new label indicating that a port number is
accepted in the hostname field and handles this.  This will be in the next build
of anaconda.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.