Bug 230667 - -d option to dnssec-signzone does not work
Summary: -d option to dnssec-signzone does not work
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: bind   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 5.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Adam Tkac
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: FutureFeature
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-03-02 00:06 UTC by Sander Steffann
Modified: 2013-04-30 23:35 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: RHBA-2007-0744
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-11-07 17:27:58 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2007:0744 normal SHIPPED_LIVE bind bug fix update 2007-10-30 23:00:26 UTC

Description Sander Steffann 2007-03-02 00:06:09 UTC
Description of problem:
The -d option (specify different key directory) of dnssec-signzone does not
work. Using strace I see dnssec-signzone trying to open the keys in the current
cirectory, with and without the -d option.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
bind-9.3.3-5.el5 (although the software reports 9.3.3rc2)

How reproducible:
- Create a DNS zone file (example.com)
- Create a zone signing key:
  dnssec-keygen -a RSASHA1 -b 1024 -n ZONE example.com
- Create a key signing key:
  dnssec-keygen -f KSK -a RSASHA1 -b 1280 -n ZONE example.com
- Add the contents of the generated .key files to the zone file
- Move the key files (both .key and .private) to another directory
- Sign the zone:
  dnssec-signzone -d /other/dir/ example.com

Actual results:
This will fail with the error: "dnssec-signzone: warning: No keys specified or
found". Placing the .key and .private files in the same directory as the zone
file makes it work (with and without the -d option)

Expected results:
It should use the specified directory instead of the current directory.

Comment 1 Adam Tkac 2007-04-11 13:57:58 UTC
dnssec-signzone now really ignores -d option. Could you please test proposed fix
and tell me your impressions?
http://people.redhat.com/atkac/test_srpms/bind-9.3.3-8.1.el5.src.rpm

Regards, -A-

Comment 2 Sander Steffann 2007-04-11 14:05:34 UTC
I'm downloading the source RPM now, and I'll test it as soon as possible. I will
be out of the office tomorrow, but I hope to have it tested by friday.

Comment 3 Sander Steffann 2007-04-11 15:38:49 UTC
Fix confirmed. Works like a charm :)

Thanks!
Sander


Comment 4 Adam Tkac 2007-04-11 15:41:36 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
Yeah, thanks for your very fast response. Fix could be avaliable in RHEL5 U1

-A-

Comment 6 RHEL Product and Program Management 2007-04-25 20:56:32 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 9 Adam Tkac 2007-05-07 14:49:49 UTC
Upstream denied proposed patch because it breaks regression. -d option is now
used for keyset files for child zones, not for signing keys. It's absolutely
neccessary create new option. I've called it -D and proposed update is now
avaliable (http://people.redhat.com/atkac/test_srpms/bind-9.3.3-8.2.el5.src.rpm)

Regards, Adam

Comment 13 Sander Steffann 2007-05-29 14:40:56 UTC
Sorry for the late reply. I will look at this new version soon. I just read up
on the -d option in bind, and it is very useful the way it is now, so good
decision to add a new -D option :-)

Comment 14 Sander Steffann 2007-05-29 14:59:18 UTC
Can you make the RPM available again? The current link does not work anymore.

Comment 15 Adam Tkac 2007-05-29 16:12:01 UTC
(In reply to comment #14)
Yeah. You could visit http://people.redhat.com/atkac/test_srpms/ and download
rhel5 version. I always doing cleanup after reporter verify fix :)

Regards, -A-



Comment 19 errata-xmlrpc 2007-11-07 17:27:58 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0744.html



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.