Bug 231052 - libboost_*.so symlinks missing
Summary: libboost_*.so symlinks missing
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: boost
Version: 4.4
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Petr Machata
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-03-05 20:26 UTC by Bryn M. Reeves
Modified: 2018-10-19 22:50 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHBA-2008-0693
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-07-24 19:37:25 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2008:0693 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE boost bug fix update 2008-07-23 15:51:54 UTC

Description Bryn M. Reeves 2007-03-05 20:26:02 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #122817 +++

Looks like the fix for this never made it over from FC -> RHEL4.

Description of problem:
The libboost_*.so symlinks seem to be missing.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.31.0-6


-- Additional comment from bkoz on 2005-03-16 18:15 EST --

Yep. I believe I finally fixed this for real in boost-1.32.0-4, and will be
pushing this out shortly.

best,
benjamin

-- Additional comment from gbritton on 2005-03-18 23:54 EST --
looking at boost-1.32.0-5 from fc3-updates-testing, the .so symlinks are packaged
in the main package, they should be packaged in the -devel package as they are
only used during linking.

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2007-06-01 11:24:16 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 3 Ken Reilly 2007-08-08 19:24:26 UTC
I cleared the rhel-4.6, dev_ack and qa_ack flags since this problem has not been
resolved in 4.6. The package will be reassigned to another developer and it's
resolution will be determined in the coming months. 

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2008-07-24 19:37:25 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0693.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.