Bug 231052 - libboost_*.so symlinks missing
libboost_*.so symlinks missing
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: boost (Show other bugs)
4.4
All Linux
medium Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Petr Machata
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-03-05 15:26 EST by Bryn M. Reeves
Modified: 2015-05-04 21:33 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2008-0693
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-07-24 15:37:25 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Bryn M. Reeves 2007-03-05 15:26:02 EST
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #122817 +++

Looks like the fix for this never made it over from FC -> RHEL4.

Description of problem:
The libboost_*.so symlinks seem to be missing.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.31.0-6


-- Additional comment from bkoz@redhat.com on 2005-03-16 18:15 EST --

Yep. I believe I finally fixed this for real in boost-1.32.0-4, and will be
pushing this out shortly.

best,
benjamin

-- Additional comment from gbritton@doomcom.org on 2005-03-18 23:54 EST --
looking at boost-1.32.0-5 from fc3-updates-testing, the .so symlinks are packaged
in the main package, they should be packaged in the -devel package as they are
only used during linking.
Comment 2 RHEL Product and Program Management 2007-06-01 07:24:16 EDT
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.
Comment 3 Ken Reilly 2007-08-08 15:24:26 EDT
I cleared the rhel-4.6, dev_ack and qa_ack flags since this problem has not been
resolved in 4.6. The package will be reassigned to another developer and it's
resolution will be determined in the coming months. 
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2008-07-24 15:37:25 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0693.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.