Bug 231153 - Upgrade to axis-1.4-2jpp.src.rpm
Upgrade to axis-1.4-2jpp.src.rpm
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: axis (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Permaine Cheung
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-03-06 10:44 EST by Anthony Green
Modified: 2008-05-06 21:16 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2008-05-06 21:16:40 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Anthony Green 2007-03-06 10:44:39 EST
Description of problem:
I wanted to use axis for something, but the version in FC6 is too old.  Please
upgrade to the latest.  Here's the JPackage link....


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:
Comment 1 Permaine Cheung 2007-03-06 11:16:04 EST
The reason we're at an older version is because the 1.4 version of axis has the
following BuildRequires which are not in FC6:

httpunit, xmlunit, bea-stax-api, geronimo-j2ee-1.4-apis,
geronimo-servlet-2.4-api, jakarta-commons-net, xml-commons-jaxp-1.2-apis,
xmlbeans, xml-security and jetty.

Comment 2 Anthony Green 2007-03-06 11:24:46 EST
It looks like some of those will be in F7.  I'll change this to a "devel" bug,
and not an FC6 one.

The following packages have not been submitted for F7 review yet:
jetty, xml-security, xml-commons-jaxp-1.2-api2, geronimo-servlet-2.4-api,
geronimo-j2ee-1.4-apis, xmlunit.

I guess what you're saying is that you would upgrade axis if those dependencies
were added, right?
Comment 3 Permaine Cheung 2007-03-06 12:37:03 EST
xml-commons-jaxp-1.2-api2 should be in xml-commons, and the geronimo* should be
in geronimo-specs-1.1.
That leaves xmlunit, xml-security needed for F7 reviews.
For jetty, I have to see if it can work with tomcat instead since it is another
web container.
Comment 4 Permaine Cheung 2007-03-07 11:22:03 EST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231305 has been opened for
xml-security and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231303 for
I tried building it without jetty successfully.
Comment 5 Bug Zapper 2008-04-03 19:38:10 EDT
Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported
against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no
longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are
flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer
maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now,
we will automatically close it.

If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or
rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change
the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version
or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.)

Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled
these issues to this point.

The process we're following is outlined here:

We will be following the process here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this
doesn't happen again.
Comment 6 Bug Zapper 2008-05-06 21:16:38 EDT
This bug has been in NEEDINFO for more than 30 days since feedback was
first requested. As a result we are closing it.

If you can reproduce this bug in the future against a maintained Fedora
version please feel free to reopen it against that version.

The process we're following is outlined here:

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.