Description of problem: I wanted to use axis for something, but the version in FC6 is too old. Please upgrade to the latest. Here's the JPackage link.... http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/jpackage/1.7/generic/free/RPMS/axis-1.4-2jpp.noarch.rpm Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
The reason we're at an older version is because the 1.4 version of axis has the following BuildRequires which are not in FC6: httpunit, xmlunit, bea-stax-api, geronimo-j2ee-1.4-apis, geronimo-servlet-2.4-api, jakarta-commons-net, xml-commons-jaxp-1.2-apis, xmlbeans, xml-security and jetty.
It looks like some of those will be in F7. I'll change this to a "devel" bug, and not an FC6 one. The following packages have not been submitted for F7 review yet: jetty, xml-security, xml-commons-jaxp-1.2-api2, geronimo-servlet-2.4-api, geronimo-j2ee-1.4-apis, xmlunit. I guess what you're saying is that you would upgrade axis if those dependencies were added, right?
xml-commons-jaxp-1.2-api2 should be in xml-commons, and the geronimo* should be in geronimo-specs-1.1. That leaves xmlunit, xml-security needed for F7 reviews. For jetty, I have to see if it can work with tomcat instead since it is another web container.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231305 has been opened for xml-security and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231303 for xmlunit. I tried building it without jetty successfully.
Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now, we will automatically close it. If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again.
This bug has been in NEEDINFO for more than 30 days since feedback was first requested. As a result we are closing it. If you can reproduce this bug in the future against a maintained Fedora version please feel free to reopen it against that version. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp